In the first place I assume that you do not act fraudulently and want to point out that any effort that is spent into planning and production of such power stations is pointless The power plant has therefore in any case, a negativeĮnergy received from the plant minus energy supplied to the plant is less than zero. In a practical application it is even necessary to put in a little more energy than can be recovered by the buoyancy force. The energy needed for this corresponds exactly to that amount of energy which can be recovered from the air-filled container through buoyancy. Reason: If there is air blown into a submerged tank, which is filled with water, then contained water inside the container has to be moved to the outside (i.e., into the surrounding You report about a so-called "buoyancy power plant" that does not work in my physical I heard about your website through the newsletter of the Association GAIA.
#Gaia project shut up and sit down full
Here is the full text of my e-mail to Rosch and GAIA from : So all in all, NO EXCESS energy is gained in this process. And the energy needed for this is exactly the amount that is gained by If oneīrings 1 m³ of additional water into a certain depth, then one also has to displace 1 m³ of the surrounding water. This blown out water is therefore no longer located in the tank after the injection process but in the surrounding water (where else it should have gone?).
The air which was blown into it forces the water out which has previously sunkĭownwards in the same container. In the featured Rosch power plant air is blown into one (or more) container at its lowest point with a compressor. Here is my short explanation of the physics behind the model. Of 2 m height at the congress in Munich."? Note: Why has the following sentence been added: "It does not reflect the characteristics of the mobile functional model, which was presented among other things in an easily transportable version However, everybody should get his/her own idea of it. My physics knowledge tell a different story (see below). Transportable version of 2 m height at the congress in Munich. It does not reflect the characteristics of the mobile functional model, which was presented among other things in an easily Protocol for this prototype was already created in mid-June 2014. The system was further examined with an endoscope and the entire water column was drained in order to ensure that there is no fraud here.
#Gaia project shut up and sit down generator
Since the used generator produces 3-phase rotary current special measuring instruments were used, which have the benefits With almost the same input power resulted in 10.7 kW on the output side. The measured values confirm that during the measurement period in the operating phase on the input side 1,8 kW were consumed while on the output side 11,37 kW were produced. In order to ensure correct statements regarding the power plant capacity under operating conditions, a measurement protocol of a current 12 kW prototype at ROSCH in Serbia was created. The detail page of the project with the name "Measurements taken" states literally: And I am absolutely sure that such a power plant can not be found. Provides the necessary technical and economic security in order to produce small systems for our GAIA-project, that are technically sophisticated and durable.ĭo you know, dear reader, only a single power plant, which was built by Rosch? I was not able to find a single one. We met the management of Rosch AG as a competent and reputable partner. Their buoyancy power plants are installed primarily abroad in large numbers. The GAIA newsletter from states literally: This small website was created so that possible participants in this workshop are able to better assess risks that they incur when they get involved in this project. It is NOT explained why it is thought to function at all, since all principles of physical knowledge are contradicted.
How the system works, is only explained in a very simple manner. Installation, nor inverter to connect the plant to the household wiring, nor battery, and so on. However, these costs do not include local GAIA demands for a participation in the workshop a deposit of 2,400 euros and the commitment to pay the total cost of 12,000 euros afterwards. That such a prototype had already been built in Belgrade, I could not even find the address of Rosch Tech d.o.o., Grge Andrijanovica ulica 3, br.14bc in 11000 Beograd Srbija using Google Maps. Although ROSCH is claiming on its website
Neither is there a patent for such a type of power plant (for perpetual motion no patents are granted), nor is there a proven working prototype. However, this is physically impossible (see explanation below). Is offering workshops in which a so-called kinetic power plant can be built up with an alleged continuous net power output of 5 6 kW. In cooperation with ROSCH holding the GAIA-Society
0 kommentar(er)
